Looking at my preliminary task School Magazine it is clear that it is not as good as my final product. This is because I only used one type of editing software to make it (picmonkey) and made it in collage form with everything separated, no colour scheme, and no general organisation to the page. While simple, I liked it at first because it was set out in a magazine form and was a good first try at making anything digitally. When making this I didn't have the skills that I have obviously now developed, which is clear through the lack of proper logo, the mixed backgrounds, the plain fonts, and the lack of colour scheme.
I have learnt through the development of making my magazine is how to combine skills across various editing tools, how to make my own logo, use a colour scheme, position images, and make my magazine look realistic and able to sell. I also learnt how to use my TA so that it is tailored to them, whereas for my prelim magazine I had no specific audience (except for schoolchildren) and that shows through the mixed techniques all over the cover.
My development of skills made while creating my product is obvious in comparing the two covers. It shows that I learned how to develop techniques and use them in the correct context and how to apply them to what would be attractive to my TA.
The quality of my images differs too- on my school cover I used my phone camera which, when stretched to fill the page, lost its quality. On my music magazine cover, while still not HD, the image is a lot clearer and stands out a lot more. On the school cover the artificial lighting was classroom lighting, so it wasn't bright enough or good enough. On my music magazine cover I used stage lights to put all the focus on the artists and less on the rest of them room so they were well lit (I would have used natural lighting but it was winter).
Comparing my cover pages you can see how I learnt to apply a transparent image onto a background instead of having to use the existing one, continue a colour scheme, and organise the writing so that it is readable and formatted to fit on the page.
I feel that through making my final product from where I started with the first product I have been able to edit images properly without just leaving them as is, organise the graphology of a page, use coverlines appropriately, avoid overcrowding a page, and generally make my magazine worth selling while still fitting in with the conventions of a magazine. Looking back at my preliminary task I can see how much my skills have been able to develop over time and how much I have learned and been able to apply while I went along, especially while keeping my target audience in consideration.
From the start when making my prelim magazine I had thought it would be simple and easy to create a magazine, but by using the blogging process what would have turned out to be and extremely hard task was made slightly easier through being able to post every thought and detail that went into it. I have been able to identify any errors that I discovered as I went along and was able to correct them easily. I gained feedback a couple of times on places I would have struggled with without using my TA, such as choosing a title, and I have been able to reflect on that positively.